Search for: "Ross v. Express Co." Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has in practice been unwilling to extend the principle beyond the facts of Healy and Brown-Forman, which involved laws that by "express terms" or "inevitable effect" regulate out-of-state commerce.[22] Some contend that the extraterritoriality cases are best read to invalidate only state laws that "discriminat[e] against out-of-state rivals or consumers"—that is, extraterritoriality must be understood as an application of the first… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Erica Ross told the justices that the case was “clearly moot. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nye and I (with the help of UCLA School of Law student Skyler Ross) have filed an amicus brief, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Leaving aside (for now) the allegations of biased lawyers and experts, which are not new  – parental non co-operation alone is not a lawful basis for removing children. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:26 am by Joy Waltemath
“The congressional policy regarding the exercise of district court discretion in the ultimate decision whether to award fees does not distinguish between merits-based and nonmerits-based judgments,” the Court stated, noting that as it explained in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:54 pm by Kathy Kapusta
“The congressional policy regarding the exercise of district court discretion in the ultimate decision whether to award fees does not distinguish between merits-based and nonmerits-based judgments,” the Court stated, noting that as it explained in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Noncompliance with the statute renders an attempted conversion “ineffective” (Miller v Ross, 43 AD3d 730 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Morrison Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director, Berkeley Center for Law and Business, UC Berkeley School of Law Mark G. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 20, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black male's age and race/failure-to-promote + retal + HWE claims5th Circuit* Barnett v The Boeing Co., No. 08-20232. (5th Cir. [read post]