Search for: "Rothschild v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 5:30 pm
In 2009, the Supreme Court of the United States in a case known as Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLPOn August 18, 2010 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No 33-9135, a cease and desist order (the Order) settling claims against the state of New Jersey as a result of what the SEC determined was inadequate disclosure of the financial condition of New Jersey's pension funds.Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plansHunton & Williams… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
.'" Fox Rothschild's White Collar Defense and Compliance blog writes: "Third Circuit Reminds That In Criminal Cases A Joint Representation Conflict Of Interest Is Not Avoided Simply Because The Clients Consent And Waive Any Conflict" -- "A recent illustration of the point is presented in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
In one recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
In one recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 279 U.S. 151, 49 S. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
” The United States Supreme Court has recognized that the Establishment Clause is violated where there is clearly no secular purpose for the state action being challenged and the “activity was motivated wholly by religious considerations. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
In the case of Pasqua v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
United States, 404 F.3d 744, 750 (3d Cir. 2005), and dismissal is appropriate only if, accepting all of the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the plaintiff has failed to plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
