Search for: "Rowles v. Rowles"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Nucci v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
Rowling's movie franchise" http://j.mp/qnfGiI The Black Times is out! [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
These include the limitation of the obligation to publications that would involve the revelation of plainly intimate or sensitive facts (so, not for example in the JK Rowling case) [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:50 am
Rowling, but thousands of people you’ve never heard of whose lives and careers were crushed by mob attacks and accusations in smaller venues that never rise to the level of the NYT front page. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The 1709 Blog succinctly summarises the issues and the ruling in NLA v Meltwater here on whether end-users of an online media monitoring service require a licence from the owners of copyright in the works monitored and. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
The appellant, Associated Newspapers lost its challenge to a High Court ruling that author JK Rowling should be allowed to read a unilateral statement in open court as part of the settlement of a libel claim. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone 113-22 (1997). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
”- at p.7 The development of children’s right to privacy under Article 8 and the nuances of the Campbell test Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446, concerned an action under Article 8 made by the Murray’s (Mrs Murray being better known as JK Rowling) on behalf of their child, David, to prevent a series of photographs taken of them as a family out in public from being published. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
Rowling herself on the one hand and big corporate publishers on the other? [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Rowling is not the only one who is concerned about the erasure of the female from our discourse. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
This week’s witnesses included Hugh Grant; Steve Coogan; Garry Flitcroft; Bob and Sally Dowler; Margaret and Jim Watson; Joan Smith; JK Rowling; Max Mosley and Gerry and Kate McCann. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Rowling. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
Tom estava sempre arquitetando um plano para capturar o ágil e esperto Jerry – e todos adoravam vê-lo fracassar. [read post]
