Search for: "Rowles v. Rowles"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
In F.H. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 1:07 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:39 pm
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:04 pm
Entertainment v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
"The District Court analyses leading case law in the issue of transformative and derivative works (such as Castle Rock Entertainment v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:33 pm
The opinion in the Warner Brothers Entertainment & JK Rowling v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
This wasn't even a difficult case: the events took place in private behind closed and locked doors, not in the more contested world of the outdoors (cf Rowling (Murray v Big Picture)); the case wasn't contaminated as in Douglas by the existence of a threatened connected revenue stream. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
Rowling) and necessary in order for people to know what I am describing. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
In a recent complaint, Smith v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 6:53 am
Rowling didn't need the Dark Arts to make the paparazzi go poof", writes Gina Serpe at Yahoo! [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
" Ty Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
With an unsurprising take: Rowling seeks to stop ‘The Harry Potter Lexicon’ from being published (pdf) Now that the petty wrangling, emotional outbursts and mind-numbing duels over Latin words roots have ended, the federal judge in this week’s Harry Potter trial faces a daunting task: How do you balance an author’s right to protect her copyrighted novels with a publisher’s right to produce a new book that borrows heavily from these… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Rowling and Warner Bros. v. [read post]
