Search for: "Running v. USA" Results 101 - 120 of 1,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Her organization, CHILD USA, continues the fight to reform SOLs to allow into court victims of abuse and to grow the civil rights of children, even against religions. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Gender violence happens no matter what the circumstances are, including all the harms that were increased by the pandemic.I always teach United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:48 am by Donald Dinnie
” The judgment is Santo’s Italian Café LLC v Acuity Insurance Company No. 21-3068 (6th Cir. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
In October 2016, the ACLU filed a motion seeking access to the court’s opinions and orders from Sept. 11, 2001 through the passage of the USA Freedom Act in 2015 (in which Congress required some declassification of opinions but which did not apply to prior opinions). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  According to the Director of the White House National Economic Council, half the increases in grocery prices can be attributed to, and are driven by, price increases in poultry, beef and pork. 2) The Department of Agriculture Appears to Have Hit the Ground Running on Reforms The U.S. [read post]
Public Awareness MSM argued the information shouldn’t lose protection just because the radio stations and customers are aware of one another and cited a 2009 federal court decision (SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  Talks broke down, however, over Sun’s insistence that any application programs (“apps”) written for Android must follow its “write once, run anywhere” philosophy. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
This is the effect of R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2, a judgment handed down on 5 February 2021. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Gary Corn
Second, it is not even clear that compelling Chinese companies to share customer data with the government constitutes espionage in the traditional sense or runs counter to any U.S. domestic laws—a fact that would also complicate efforts to pursue espionage-related prosecutions in U.S. courts. [read post]