Search for: "Russ v. Russ" Results 101 - 120 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by Renee Newman Knake
Friday 9-10:30, Room KC 305 Loyalty & Confidences, Presenters Kathleen Clark, Brent Cotter, Carol Needham & Margaret Tarkington, Panel Chair Jim Varro 10:45-12:15, Room KC 203 Global Comparisons II, Presenters Donna Buckingham, John Law, Judy McMorrow & Michael Ogwezzy, Panel Chair Jeff Thorn 1:30-3:15, Room KC 203 LawWithoutWalls, Presenters Ray Campbell, Elizabeth Chambliss, John Flood, Tahlia Gordon, Bruce Green, Renee Newman Knake, Steve Mark, Deborah Rhode, Rob Rosen, Rita Shakel… [read post]
9 May 2025, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Friedman, P.C., 153 AD3d 1250, 1252 [alteration omitted], quoting Rozen v Russ & Russ, P.C., 76 AD3d 965, 968). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:08 am by Tom Crane
 You lose at least before the San Antonio Court of Appeals in Central Texas Orthopedic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm by Walter Olson
Judge Kozinski blasts prosecution of McAfee exec Probhat Goyal [Ribstein, Greenfield; related on federal overcriminalization, Rittgers/Cato] “If only laws were like sausages” [Robert Pear, NY Times] “Public Radio Looks at California ADA Lawsuits” [Frith, CJAC on "This American Life," Thomas Mundy and Morse Mehrban] Guitar maker described as “litigation-addled”: “Gibson continues its IP-based business plan” [Coleman] Judge who heard… [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same" (Reid v Reid, 198 AD3d 993, 994). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
Russ Bleemer has two different posts for CPR: International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution — a broad overview of the decision and another focused on Justice Kagan’s dissent. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Although many statute of limitations cases relate only to a plaintiff’s failure to take timely action, a recent decision from the First District Court of Appeals, Russ v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” In a video at CPR Speaks, Russ Bleemer and others discuss the court’s “recently declining to hear a California Supreme Court case on arbitration and unconscionability,” OTO LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Russ Bleemer and other discuss the decision in a video at CPR Speaks. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:33 am by Ben Sheffner
The Ninth Circuit has posted to its web site an audio recording of Monday's oral arguments in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]