Search for: "S S v. State of Indiana" Results 101 - 120 of 5,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 8:55 am by Michael R. Smith
Last July, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided Rogers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Heartland Consumer Products LLC and TC Heartland LLC, of Carmel, Indiana filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, the Indiana State Trademark Act, and the common law of the State of Indiana. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 6:15 am by Don Asher
       2022 Indiana State Fair Celebrating Indianas Automotive Excellence Boosting Indianas automotive industry continues through the summer. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
State, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for two counts of Murder and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Murder. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
Here’s a breathtakingly broad decision: The Indiana Supreme Court, in Barnes v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:00 am by Fox Williams & Sink
On New Year’s Eve, December 31, 2015, Indianas Court of Appeals, in the matter of Harris v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:42 am by Fox Williams & Sink
On New Year’s Eve, December 31, 2015, Indianas Court of Appeals, in the matter of Harris v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
After all, the basis for the court’s decision was Indianas state RFRA, which in every relevant respect is identical to the federal RFRA. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
With the recent ruling the Indiana State Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's ruling in favor of the family of a boy who died during basketball practice. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm by Thomas Fisher
Fisher is the solicitor general of Indiana, which joined 14 other states and the governors of two states in an amicus brief supporting the administration in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am by Jennifer Watt
The Court went on to state that “the Industrial Power/BMD contract unambiguously states that Industrial Power’s receipt of payment is a condition precedent to BMD’s right to payment. [read post]