Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 101 - 120 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 6:12 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether R.C. 124.27(B) or R.C. 124.56 can support Greeley claims for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
A dog owner does not, and should not, need notice to ensure his or her dog doesn’t injure other people. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am by MBettman
Bartholomew, 2008-Ohio-4080 (“[T]he purpose of R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) is to require the offender to reimburse the victim — or whatever entity paid the victim — for the economic loss caused by the crime. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am by MBettman
Key Precedent R.C. 2907.02(D) (Ohio’s Rape Shield Law)(“Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual activity . . . shall not be admitted . . . . [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am by MBettman
Because R.C. 9.75 was enacted pursuant to Section 34, and does improve employees’ freedom of residency, Cleveland’s home rule challenge fails. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am by MBettman
State’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law R.C. 2907.02(D) applies to any sexual activity, whether consensual or nonconsensual. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by MBettman
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2950 (Ohio’s sex offender classifications and registration requirements, including duty to register, residency restrictions, and geographic notifications.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
”16 The Court continued on to state that R.C. 163.14 requires the jury to assess the damages to rest due “without deductions for general benefits to an owner’s property. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 1:59 am by Joseph E. Balmer
Under R.C. 3103.03, the necessaries statute, the debtor spouse has primary liability for his/her own debts. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
Hairston was later indicted and charged with violation of R.C. 2923.12, carrying a concealed weapon. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am by MBettman
In Judge Miller’s view, “once a juvenile court makes an appropriate classification under R.C. 2152.83, it is permanently vested with jurisdiction to review the classification in accordance with R.C. 2152.84 and 2152.85. [read post]