Search for: "S.C.1" Results 101 - 120 of 1,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm by Gregory Forman
Two lessons: 1) judges are frequently wrong; 2) any law school graduate has the necessary skills to handle an appeal. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:52 am
March 10, 2022 - 1 PM: Creel Abogados, S.C. and Carlos Creel Carrera v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
(f) Tax will be fully phased out by Jan. 1, 2028. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:59 am by Aamra Ahmad
After years of work by advocates, in 2010, Congress decreased the sentencing disparity from 100-to-1 to 18-to-1 through the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:59 am by Aamra Ahmad
After years of work by advocates, in 2010, Congress decreased the sentencing disparity from 100-to-1 to 18-to-1 through the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 10:36 am by Jon Brodkin
Enlarge / Gigi Sohn answering questions on December 1, 2021 at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on her nomination to the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am by Elie Maalouf
Although the New Hampshire Bar Ethics Committee has not addressed the propriety of an attorney indemnification clause, every other ethics committee to consider this issue—of which we are aware—has concluded that it is improper for a plaintiff’s attorney to sign a release requiring the attorney hold harmless and indemnify the releasees from claims arising out of the plaintiff’s failure to pay liens.1 This article will discuss these ethics opinions and the ethical… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am by Elie Maalouf
Although the New Hampshire Bar Ethics Committee has not addressed the propriety of an attorney indemnification clause, every other ethics committee to consider this issue—of which we are aware—has concluded that it is improper for a plaintiff’s attorney to sign a release requiring the attorney hold harmless and indemnify the releasees from claims arising out of the plaintiff’s failure to pay liens.1 This article will discuss these ethics opinions and the ethical… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
But I do believe they are generally constitutionally permissible in many situations, given that property owners generally don't have a First Amendment right to exclude speakers or speech they dislike,[1] and given the broad acceptance of bans on discrimination based on religious affiliation. [read post]