Search for: "SAMUEL A. ALITO, Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Hayes and Samuel Tilden. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:50 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the court could still decide the validity of late-arriving ballots after the election if necessary, because the state has agreed to keep late-arriving ballot separate. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:24 am
Justice Samuel Alito asked whether moving cars among impound lots would be an action. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
In dissent, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas admonished the majority, claiming that the decision reduced First Amendment rights while expanding abortion rights during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 pm
” Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the court’s decision to put the case on hold. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
In response to a statutory interpretation question presented by Justice Samuel Alito, Bronni argues for a limited interpretation of the broad language of the statute. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
Illinois (1872) was the only instance in Supreme Court history when a justice had cast a vote declaring unconstitutional a law that discriminated against women. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:12 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored a plurality opinion, which was fully joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion, Neuman argues, “not only rewrote and marginalized prior precedent on habeas corpus, but reached out to decide an important procedural due process issue that his own analysis had rendered irrelevant. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In both cases, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh announced the judgment of the court and issued a plurality opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined fully and Justice Clarence Thomas joined with respect to the First Amendment analysis but not the remedy. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
” Kavanaugh, with whom Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined, said that the government-debt exception is not a compelling interest that satisfies strict scrutiny. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that “[a]fter just under three years (and three Supreme Court terms) on the job, Noel Francisco announced today that he would step down as the solicitor general of the United States, effective July 3, 2020. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 am
The opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas and joined in full by Chief Justice John Roberts and by Justices Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, emphasized that the court would require a “clearer manifestation of congressional intent” to recognize a damages remedy when the constitutional text does not explicitly provide for one. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[s]ome justices including conservative Justice Samuel Alito appeared concerned about the potentially broad ramifications of a ruling backing tribal authority. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
Further, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that, in the case at hand, he would continue to follow the Court’s liberal precedents applying the intelligible principle, but only because there was not a majority to overturn those precedents. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
