Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA"
Results 101 - 120
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
North Carolina would not apply the factors enunciated in U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:02 am
See North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission, Inquiry No. 08-234, Public Reprimand of B. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:27 pm
The intricacies of North Carolina workers' compensation can be complex; which is why it is so important to have an experienced North Carolina injury attorney guiding you to the award you deserve. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:01 am
Belk, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:43 pm
California, Arkansas, North Carolina, New York, Vermont, and Rhode Island are among the states that have legislatively considered this language. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm
StubHub, Inc., overturned a trial court order that ignored the strong protection that federal law gives to online intermediaries and held online ticket site StubHub responsible for a user's violation of a North Carolina law that prohibits predatory ticket reselling. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:33 am
This styling of StubHub as a venue, not the seller, also disposes of the plaintiffs' related claim that StubHub overcharged the maximum service fee that a "seller" or its agent can charge (a law that North Carolina has since amended to exclude StubHub). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
A North Carolina court held that physician reliance precluded warranty liability:Here the drug purchased by plaintiff was not available to the general public in the sense that it was available for purchase by any customer who came in the drug store, selected it from the shelf, and paid the price therefor. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In the workers’ compensation case, Sellers v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
IP Clause and 1st Amendment David Ardia, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill School of Law, Speech Unjoined Libel plaintiffs have long been allowed only monetary remedies, not injunctions. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
Brown, the Court unanimously held that there was no general jurisdiction over a non-U.S. subsidiary in North Carolina based only on the subsidiary’s products being sold in the state. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
The foreign subsidiaries were "in no sense at home in North Carolina. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 am
Many of the goodwill rocks have fascinating stories, including North Carolina’s own, which lived “in a desk drawer” at the state Department of Commerce before finding its way to storage at Raleigh’s Museum of Natural Sciences, where it is scheduled to be displayed when the museum’s new Nature Research Center is completed.)Only time will tell if the California pebble-peddler had a genuine lunar sample or a very expensive fake. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Going beyond the terms of comment k, the Idaho court next decreed that “a seller next must establish that the product’s risk is in fact ‘unavoidable. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 28 Cal. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:14 pm
Phrased differently, the use of its website to scalp tickets in violation of North Carolina law was a predictable consequence of its business model. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
