Search for: "SHELL OIL COMPANY V US"
Results 101 - 120
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 6:00 am
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
” The Oil Companies contracted to have McColl, a former Shell engineer, dump the waste at property in Fullerton, California. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm
On the other side of the table is one of the largest oil companies in the world, Royal Dutch Petroleum, which reaped a reported $30 billion in profits in 2011. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
But win or lose, these cases expose to the glare of international publicity environmental practices that fall short of the standards oil companies use when operating in developed countries. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:41 pm
Exxon Mobil, the biggest U.S. oil company, may face millions of dollars in damages. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Kozel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Kozel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Lowell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:00 pm
Fourth, in the context of applying the ‘necessary or proper party’ gateway, the practical objectives of avoiding two trials on similar facts and events in different parts of the world outweigh the need for the existence of a territorial connection between England and the claim against a foreign subsidiary of the English-domiciled parent company. 4) Unlike in Vedanta, the foreign claimants in Okpabi v Shellfailed to establish jurisdiction of the English courts over… [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:43 am
Shell Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54, 68-69 (1984), the Ninth Circuit opined that the relevance standard encompasses “virtually any material that might cast light on the allegations against the employer. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
One of the companies lis [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:58 am
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997), a decision that has since stood as the definitive authority on statutory construction. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
See e.g., Pfeil v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
” The dissent was filed in Allen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
Shell Oil Co. (1996) 51 Cal. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:27 am
The BCUC found, among other things, that four oil companies (Parkland Fuel Corporation, Suncor Energy Inc., Imperial Oil Limited and Shell Canada Limited) collectively controlled about 88% of the wholesale gasoline and diesel supply in British Columbia, that the level of concentration in the market met the technical definition of an oligopoly and that the defendants possessed market power. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
Shell Oil, held that the pivotal inquiry is whether the principal has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
Bremmer describes the advantages of Chinese energy companies over "free market" competitors like BP and Shell, and complains that state subsidies to them "add[] upward pressure on the prices that everyone else pays for energy and other commodities" (136). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
