Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Tanner Allread On June 15, Indian Country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Haaland v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Today, the Court resolved the question in Counterman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Grundfest at Stanford University Law School. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
Frankel quotes Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest as saying that there “is no such thing” as a federal derivative action under Section 14(a). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
I first became aware of this in a brilliant essay by Stanford historian Jonathan Gnienapp that was published in a book that I edited on nullification and secession in contemporary constitutional theory. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
Stated differently, these derivative suits concern internal corporate affairs—matters that are traditionally governed by state corporate law and, therefore, more sensibly litigated in the Delaware Chancery. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:33 pm
Beardsley Professor of Law, EmeritusThe Glacier v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:24 pm
In Slack v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Supreme Court decision Sackett v EPA overturns a decision from the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
The abstract:The Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Castro-Huerta v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 am
Brett Parker (Stanford University - Department of Political Science) has posted Polarization in State Supreme Courts, 1980-2020 on SSRN. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Among the most authoritative sources cherry-picked by the AGs is a well-regarded Stanford Law Review article by Schanzenbach and Sitkoff.[6] As the Kentucky AG notes when citing this piece of scholarship, “ESG investing is an ‘umbrella term that refers to an investment strategy that emphasizes a firm’s governance structure or the environmental or social impacts of the firm’s products or practices. [read post]
