Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF R.C." Results 101 - 120 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
The state moved to transfer Aalim to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and 2152.12 (A)(1)(b). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm by Joe Koncelik
Article I, Section 19d states: "Owners of riparian land have a property interest in the reasonable use of the water in the non-navigable lake or watercourse located on or flowing through their land. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am by MBettman
 At issue is whether the mandatory transfer of juveniles to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and R.C. 2152.12(A)(1)(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:36 pm
Pursuant to R.C. 2925.51(E), the defendant seeks to have an independent analysis of the substance. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:32 am by MBettman
R.C. 4123.931(G) explicitly states that “if a settlement or compromise excludes any amount paid by the statutory subrogee, the third party and the claimant shall be jointly and severally liable” for the amount. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
The interests of an individual and his privacy rights must be balanced against the officers’ interest in securing their safety and the safety of the public. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am by MBettman
State’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law R.C. 2907.02(D) applies to any sexual activity, whether consensual or nonconsensual. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am by MBettman
Interviews by social workers like the one that took place here serve important health and safety interests of child victims. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Ironically, Minnesota and Wisconsin do not enjoy reciprocity with each other, since the Minnesota law permits the Commissioner of Revenue to rescind any such automatic reciprocity when they deem it to be “in the best interests of the people of this state. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am by MBettman
JPMorgan Chase filed a motion to dismiss the adversary proceeding upon the contention, in part, that R.C. 1301.401 enacts a change in Ohio state law, such that an interest holder could no longer claim bona fide purchaser status and could no longer seek to avoid the defective, but recorded, mortgage. [read post]