Search for: "STATE OF N.J." Results 101 - 120 of 5,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
’s Top Court Says Unelected Political Candidates Can Be Charged with Bribery” by Nikita Biryukov for New Jersey Monitor New York: “Hochul’s Husband Is Leaving Delaware North” by Joshua Solomon for Albany Times Union Lobbying California: “San Jose Grants Few Former Employees Lobbying Exemptions” by Jana Kadah for San Jose Spotlight The post Tuesday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am by Jeff Welty
Hozer, 116 A.2d 193 (N.J. 1955), the court affirmed a police sergeant’s conviction for nonfeasance after he failed to mount [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:25 pm by Jeralyn
I think Trump could understand the table if explained by his lawyers: 98% of federal cases in the United States were resolved without a trial in these 12 months. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along amicus brief that I submitted earlier this month in Doe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm by Dan Tokaji
Udi Ofer in Law.com, reviewing amicus briefs in a case before the N.J. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Union County, N.J. police officer conducts "Arther Method" of a polygraph test on a suspect. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[18] Indeed, Claiborne Hardware expressly reserved the question whether a boycott "designed to secure aims that are themselves prohibited by a valid state law" is constitutionally protected.[19] It follows that the question whether a boycott that involved refusals to deal that were themselves prohibited by a valid state law—a law that targeted conduct rather than speech—was also not resolved by Claiborne Hardware. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
See also In the Matter of Wayne Pearson, Bayside State Prison, Dept. of Corrections, 2023 WL 33118862023 WL 3311886 (N.J. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal relationships, often calling for stronger… [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Justin Sherman
Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), and supported in the Senate by Sen. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elections National: “Republicans Set Presidential Debate Rules That Could Exclude Some” by Michael Scherer and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) for MSN Ethics National: “N.J. [read post]