Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF E.D."
Results 101 - 120
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Id. at *2 n.2 (“Plaintiff argues that instead of Rule 8(a)(2), the pleading requirements . . . of the New Jersey Rules . . . should apply to his complaint since it was originally filed in state court. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:21 am
American Tobacco Co., 175 F.R.D. 469, 496 n.28 (E.D. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
Lexis 93520 (E.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Being in Pennsylvania, for quite some time we’ve had more than a passing interest in this section of the Third Restatement and its essentially negligence (“reasonableness”)-based theory of product liability. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Under New Jersey’s “flexible governmental interest analysis,” no other result maintained the comity between the states:[C]omity precludes closing our eyes to Michigan’s interest. . . . [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:36 am
In fact, they said New Jersey law should control all of the potentially hundreds of thousands of class members’ claims and recoveries throughout the United States. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Coast Guard regulations and state and federal court decisions of interest to the commercial and recreational mariners. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
” Id.A second decision, from New Jersey state court in Gaus v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In the interests of maintaining that success, we offfer here a state-by-state break down of the precedent refusing to adopt “fraud on the market” or similar presumed reliance theories to state-law (not federal - no RICO or antitrust cases here) causes of action – everything from product liability to consumer fraud to state securities and other statutes. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
That meant that New Jersey choice of laws principles applied. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
Much like how a defendant has an interest in having federal law claims against them heard in federal court, a plaintiff has an interest in having their state law claims heard in state court. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
While we're on the subject, can we get judges to rewrite the New Jersey and Minnesota statutes of limitations to add a borrowing statute? [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Code §§ 22.1-79, 22.1-125; compare New Jersey v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
(a Delaware limited liability company headquartered in New Jersey), all manufacturers of hormone replacement drugs, in federal court in Minnesota. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
If anybody's interested in following the distinction between "differential diagnosis" and "differential etiology" further, see McClain v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Supp.2d ___, 2009 WL 307019, at *17-18 (E.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
Kugler of the District of New Jersey. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Where such rulings were broad enough, they tended to create legislative backlash, as happened in New Jersey. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
(a citizen of Delaware and New Jersey), and Bayer AG (a German corporation). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Supp.2d ___, 2009 WL 307019 (E.D. [read post]
