Search for: "STATE V. SWAN" Results 101 - 120 of 230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
"  Still, with that clarification, and the recent rejection of ONRC by another District Court in the Ninth Circuit, see Swan View Coalition v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm by Suzanne Ito
Which state refused a mandatory ultrasound bill this week? [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:18 am
  But we write on class actions anyway, both because they are interesting and because even the black swan event of class certification would have devastating consequences for our clients.A recent food case called Mee v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Swan, 346 U.S. 427 (1953)andnbsp;(exercise of judicial discretion to assure effectiveness of Federalandnbsp;Securities Laws).andnbsp;andnbsp;Disadvantages to Ordinary Investors.andnbsp;andnbsp; Jury of peers versus a panel of lawyers, judges, and accountants. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]