Search for: "STATE v. ABAT"
Results 101 - 120
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 1:39 pm
The goal of RCRA is 'the prompt abatement of imminent and substantial endangerments,' and the district court has a duty not to allow progress toward that goal to be derailed or slowed because of possible delays in state proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:37 am
Although the appellant in Fidel Quintanilla v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:01 pm
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
CA Appeals Court Finds Dispensary was a Prohibited “Medical Marijuana Business” Under City Ordinance
13 Oct 2016, 10:08 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
That company, with the consent of VIHA, subcontracted the asbestos abatement portion of the project to the Virgin Islands Asbestos Removal Company (VIARCO), a company owned by George. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm
Kleinberg made his remarks after closing arguments in The People of California v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Although we often are quick to forget the fact, “the real risks, the real threats, of terrorist attacks are constant and not likely soon to abate,” Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm
Tune in to explore: A host of Supreme Court developments, including action relating to DACA, immigration detention and the due process clause, Patchak and the question whether Congress can direct courts to dismiss a class of cases, and especially the United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:47 am
In Cho v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Dukes, has yet to abate. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
Also, it is well settled that municipal courts do not have the authority to order injunctive relief. 400 Edgewood, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
In Grand Prospect Partners, LP, v Ross Dress for Less Inc., Ross was negotiating with a shopping center owner Porterville, in Tulare County. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:37 pm
We the People Nevada v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:43 am
The Ninth Circuit's decision in West Linn Corporate Park, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
" The Appeals Court affirmed the decision and said, "There is no improper delegation to the EPA (compare United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
In Sunshine State Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
The Court built upon its 2007 holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
Or it might compensate property owners for mosquito abatement expenditures. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:26 am
Prezant Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 6:50 am
” Not only did the policy not insure for loss caused by mold, it went further to state it was NOT insuring for any mold testing or abatement. [read post]
