Search for: "STATE v. CARRIER" Results 101 - 120 of 4,986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
  As the GAO’s 1991 report[9] reflects, the GAO concluded that: “OPM needs to (1) ensure that Inspector General recommendations for correcting deficiencies are implemented by the carriers and (2) develop an aggressive program wide antifraud policy for pursuing enrollee and provider fraud. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Alan Brackett
The idea is to make sure the employer and its carrier are providing sufficient compensation for the worker so that the worker is not dependent on the state or federal government for support or medical care. [read post]
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
First, it included a choice of law clause (cl 1): ‘[A]ny and all disputes between Carrier and any Guest shall be governed exclusively and in every respect by the general maritime law of the United States without regard to its choice of law principles … To the extent such maritime law is not applicable, the laws of the State of California (U.S.A.) shall govern the contract, as well as any other claims or disputes arising out of that relationship. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 7:49 pm by Picl Guest Blogger
” In a stunning September 2023 State of Florida District Court of Appeals decision, Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]