Search for: "STATE v. PAEZ" Results 101 - 120 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 10:44 am by Jon Sands
Ryan, No. 16-99007 (2-1-19)(Per curiam w/Thomas, Paez, and N. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:51 am
In dissent, Berzon, joined by Schroeder, Reinhardt, Wardlaw, and Paez, argued that the evidence was disputed, and that the court could not say it was harmless.U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm by Jon Sands
  No, holds the 9th, because the state of the law at the time the state court decided the case was Oregon v. [read post]