Search for: "STATE v. VIDAL" Results 101 - 120 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United States, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The case is styled, Cynthia Farris, as next friend of Vidal de Jesus Farias, a minor v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On May 22, 2024, the day after the Federal Circuit’s en banc LKQ v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
It was further accepted that, subject to proof, damages were recoverable by those four claimants for distress both at common law and, following Vidal-Hall v Google Inc, under section 13 of the 1998. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In other words, he argued that Schrems reinforces the decision of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Rohan Vidal and Kevin Thompson v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 29 March 2011. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse of… [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]