Search for: "STEPHENS V TREASURY" Results 101 - 120 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am by Joshua Matz
For this blog, Stephen Vladeck reports on oral argument in Elgin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The district court dismissed the Stephens County matter for lack of standing and the Apache Tribe matter as not ripe. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Treasury of $500,000 and to institute a compliance plan to ensure that no future over-billing would occur. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by charonqc
Would HM Treasury have gone to a non-magic circle firm for the Government bailout? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
The city will have to remit that money to the federal treasury if it is not used by December 2011. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
” The Dissent The famous dissent by Justice Stephen Field began by saying that the Louisiana statute went well beyond what was necessary to protect the citizens from the unhealthy aspects of operating slaughterhouses, and thus was not merely an exercise of the state’s police power. [read post]