Search for: "STEVEN D. HALL" Results 101 - 120 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Hall v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm by Jeff Gamso
I'd thought I might wait until tomorrow to offer first thoughts. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
§2412(d)(1)(A) (2000 ed.), allows a prevailing party in a case brought by or against the Government to recover fees for paralegal services at the market rate for such services or only at their cost to the party's attorney. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by Jim Reed
How much of the cause was the marijuana the driver told law enforcement officers he’d smoked the night before? [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:58 am by Jeff Foust
Steven Palazzo (R-MS), chairman of that committee’s space subcommittee; and Rep. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that a new lawsuit against Colorado civil rights officials by cake artist Jack Phillips, who prevailed in last term’s Masterpiece Cakeshop case “because [the Supreme Court] saw signs that the Colorado civil-rights commission was overtly hostile toward [Phillips’] religious beliefs,” indicates that Phillips’ “conscience bars him from creating a much wider array of goodies,… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Anderson, PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, @asandrson Excerpt: Introduction & Part III[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:37 pm by Amy Howe and Mark Walsh
She was present in July 2019 when the late Justice John Paul Stevens, who succeeded Douglas in 1975, died and lay in repose in the Great Hall. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:23 am
The section entitled "overt acts"  introduces employees  A,B, C, D, E , F and N who testified about various aspects of the fraudulent activities which they observed or participated in. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am by Jeff Gamso
 John Paul Stevens, who'd dissented in Penry began his opinion (for a different 5-4 majority) this way.Those mentally retarded persons who meet the law's requirements for criminal responsibility should be tried and punished when they commit crimes. [read post]