Search for: "Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd." Results 101 - 120 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd. and the IPAB order in the Payyannur Ring matter. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:45 pm by dbmadmin
The long running DOJ investigation focused on the world’s leading manufacturers of LCD panels, including AUO, Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm by Stan
Let’s have a look at the shareholding structure of those six factories: Shenzhen Samsung Kejian Mobile Telecommunication Technology Co., Ltd, with about 500 workers, is 60% owned by Samsung and primarily produces Samsung’s CDMA cell phones; Huizhou Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, with about 10,000 workers, is 99% owned by Samsung and primarily produces MP3/MP4 players, MINI combinedspeakers and receivers, and… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:17 am
The lawsuit between Apple, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. over issues of patent infringement finally came to a close with a judgment in Apple's favor. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:20 am by David Kemp
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both companies alleged numerous patent infringements by the other company. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:20 am by David Kemp
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both companies alleged numerous patent infringements by the other company. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:07 pm by Mandour & Associates
IPNews® - Amazon.com, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and several other companies are the targets of a new U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
The United States District Court in the Northern District of California has issued a preliminary injunction in favor of Apple, Inc. that prevents Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. from manufacturing or distributing its Galaxy Nexus smartphone in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
However, he considered a number of cases, of which only a couple were of any assistance to him: ·         Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729, noted by the IPKat here  - the dicta at para [49] were relevant and persuasive authority on when a stay may be refused on special grounds; and  ·         EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:44 pm by Doug Isenberg
Apple Inc said Samsung Electronics Co Ltd is demanding from the iPhone maker a far higher patent royalty than Apple pays to other companies, at a rate the South Korean company has never sought from any other licensee. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm by Alex Gasser
Regarding domestic industry, ITRI states that it has licensed the ‘459 patent to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Samsung”), and that Samsung conducts significant activities in the U.S. relating to products that practice at least one claim of the ‘459 patent. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:11 am by tracey
& Ors v HX Investments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 708 (31 May 2012) Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729 (30 May 2012) De Brito & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 709 (30 May 2012) QEB Metallics Ltd v Peerzada & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 728 (30 May 2012) AL (Albania) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 710 (30 May 2012) HM Revenue and Customs v Forde and McHugh… [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:15 am by aschwartz
The court based its decision largely on the decision in Samsung Electronics Co, LTD v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:01 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: AIPTEK International, Inc. of Taiwan Aluratek, Inc. of Tustin, California Archos S.A. of France Archos, Inc. of Greenwood Village, Colorado Bluestar Alliance LLC of New York, New York Centon Electronics, Inc. of Aliso Viejo, California Coby Electronics Corporation of Lake Success, New York Corsair Memory, Inc. of Fremont, California Emtec… [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 pm by admin
On May 17, 2012, leave was granted by the Supreme Court (per Justices LeBel, Fish and Cromwell) in the Quebec Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAMs) case (Samsung Electronics Co., et al v. [read post]