Search for: "Sanchez v. Banks"
Results 101 - 115
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 06, 2008 Santos-Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Sanchez-Badillo, No. 051800, 052045, 052047 Convictions and sentences for conspiring to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) jury's conspiracy verdict was not supported by evidence; 2) trial court made sentencing errors; 3) evidence was insufficient to support jury's verdict against one of the defendants on weapons charges and prosecutorial misconduct entitles him to a new trial; and 4) trial judge made impermissible… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
Vying to replace him are Migna Sanchez-Llorens and Manny Segarra.MIGNA SANCHEZ-LLORENS ..... [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Sanchez, No. 07-30578 Where, at the time of sentencing there is no guideline in effect for the particular offense of conviction, and the Sentencing Commission has promulgated a proposed guideline applicable to the offense of conviction, the district court's failure to consider the proposed guideline when sentencing the defendant may result in reversible plain error. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
McDorman, No. 05-41347 In a suit brought by former directors of a bank alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and state-law claims, a take nothing judgment against defendants is affirmed, primarily as: 1) defendants properly raised the in pari delicto defense; 2) contrary to directors' claim, in pari delicto is a cognizable defense to a civil RICO claim; 3) the district court properly followed the Bateman Eichler formulation of in pari… [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:02 am
Dec 27, 2007) (NO. 2431, 1380/05)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 12:24 am
Emmanuel Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.2007 WL 4201086(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 6:50 am
Last Thursday, we filed this cert petition in Sanchez-Aran v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Sanchez-Ramirez
• Gaona-Romero v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:38 am
Washington Mutual Bank
U.S. [read post]
