Search for: "Sandra Lawrence" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recently expressed doubts on whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
The Las Vegas Sun’s Nevada Wonk blog has a post on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s meeting with the Sun’s editorial board, in which she advocated for merit selection of state judges. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Meanwhile, Sandra Hakanson traveled all the way to Dublin, Ireland to speak at an immigration seminar presented by the Canadian Embassy and the Kelowna Region; she also attended the Canada Live! [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
The most recent example of a Justice expressing second thoughts was Sandra Day O’Connor, who retired in 2006. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
  Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has coverage. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Are the moral judgments that Fleming advocates—and that best fit and justify the cases from Meyer to Roe and Casey and on to Lawrence and Obergefell—the “best” understanding of our constitutional commitments? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
”              Rick Pildes’s observations about Justices Hugo Black and Sandra Day O’Connor underline the reality that Justices do not automatically take the positions that would win the most approval from their most salient audiences. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
" The brief also notes in this footnote that "Justice Scalia acknowledged in his dissent [in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appeals Board Significant Panel Decision Ja’Chim Scheuing (Sandra) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am by New Books Script
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 1 from 2012: Successions et libe? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders has filed a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a provision of federal law that requires the federal government to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages, or to treat the partners in same-sex marriages as spouses, for any purpose of federal law. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:31 am by F. Tim Knight
” So, as I said, a little unsettling: even if we do get a chance to look in the box it might be pretty black inside. * Thank you Sandra Geddes over at Bennett Jones SLP! [read post]