Search for: "Santiago v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
”); Santiago-Ramos v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
”); Santiago-Ramos v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
In one recent case, Martinez-Santiago v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Santiago v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:44 am
Santiago. [read post]
27 May 2016, 9:58 am
Their first post will discuss the I.V. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
Indeed, the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds, in the course of developing its “Santiago Principles” explained that as “a result of the SWFs’ increasing level of assets invested in public and private equity holdings, they are exercising greater influence on corporate governance practices” (Santiago Principles, 3 (Santiago Principles: Objective and Purpose); also Kay 2008, 11). [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:00 am
In the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas case of Santiago v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Mondragon–Santiago, 564 F.3d 357 (U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
On March 17, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court decided Santiago v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
Ct. 2013); and Santiago v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:17 pm
In a shocking act of judicial activism, the Connecticut Supreme Court in Santiago v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm
Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
