Search for: "Scott v. Montgomery" Results 101 - 111 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOTT, M.D.; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07-06-00075-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-25-08)08-0241 GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Tennessee: UCP of Middle Tennessee 1200 9th Avenue North, Suite 110 Nashville, TN 37208 Phone: (615) 242-4091 Fax: (615) 242-3582 E-mail: info@ucpnashville.org Web: http://www.ucpnashville.org UCP of the Mid-South 4189 Leroy Memphis, TN 38108 Phone: (901) 761-4277 Fax: (901) 761-7876 E-mail: ucp@ucpmemphis.org Web: http://www.ucpmemphis.org TENNESSEE STATE RESOURCES AGING Tennessee Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 500 Interstate… [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Illinois: UCP of Illinois 310 East Adams Springfield, IL 62701 Phone: (217) 528-9681; (877) 550-8274 (Toll Free) Fax: (217) 528-9739 E-mail: UCPIL@sbcglobal.net Web: http://www.ucpillinois.com UCP of Will County 311 South Reed Street Joliet, IL 60436 Phone: (815) 744-3500 Fax: (815) 744-3504 E-mail: ucpwill@ucpwill.org Web: http://www.ucpwill.org Counties covered: Ford, Grundy, Iroquois, Kankakee, Kendall, Will UCP Land of Lincoln 130 North 16th… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
The Mississippi case, which involved the fatal beating of a 56-year-old woman who had just been at church choir practice, was the third such stay since the justices decided in September to consider the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
In its decision, the court said, "The language of the statute itself and its legislative history make clear that it was contrary to law" for the council to use probation fees to pay court costs other than probation-related expenses budgeted by the judges.The only coverage of the second Supreme Court opinion yesterday, In Re: Order for Mandate of Funds; Montgomery County Council v. [read post]