Search for: "Secret v. Commonwealth" Results 101 - 120 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2013, 9:30 am by Barry Sookman
AEREO, INC., Dis… http://t.co/EAb0VycOM5 -> India opposed to controls over Internet for cybersecurity http://t.co/8M3PLWCX2D -> Enforcing Injunctions: Perhaps Not so Powerful http://t.co/mmaHVDkD7j -> Secret court argues (again) that it’s not a rubber stamp for surveillance http://t.co/VjJI9tLi6p -> Misquoting Prosser: Volition and Fox Broadcasting v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Since 1968, federal law has prohibited the use of bugging devices — secret microphones — to record private conversations. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am by Rosalind English
(Al Rawi v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] QB 289 Sumption stays scrupulously clear of any evaluation of this particular legal and ethical “muscle” and whether it should prevail over other arguably robust legal and ethical arguments, such as the need to maintain the secrecy of material supplied to the UK under intelligence cooperation arrangements (the issue at the centre of many recent cases, notably Binyam Mohammed v… [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Historically, Commonwealth infringement required use as a TM. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s Report on Democracy and Human Rights To see this report, in all its somewhat lengthy glory, click here. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Cheryl Cole is suing IPC Media, publisher of Now magazine, for defamation following a story which claimed she was involved in a “secret romance“, as Press Gazette reports here. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
§ 102(g)(2) could be used to invalidate a patent by showing another person first actually reduced the invention to practice and did not abandon, suppress or conceal the invention.[6]  Similarly, prior secret commercial use could be used to invalidate a claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In 2001 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' highest court addressed this issue in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
A British Foreign and Commonwealth Office podcast at this link marks International Human Rights Day, with an edition on social media and free expression. [read post]