Search for: "See v. Willett"
Results 101 - 120
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
This was Justice Willett’s concurrence in last week’s case Lewis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:54 pm
In that case, Kaufman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
At issue in Monterosso v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:43 am
At this point, TLK went off work, provided a doctor’s note and started seeing a psychologist.It appears TLK would only accept one outcome to her harassment complaint – to be scheduled to work away from her co-worker. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
For more on these restrictions, see here: https://bit.ly/3mu3rDo.This article was originally published on April 14, 2023 at First Reference Talks.Vey Willetts LLP is an Ottawa-based employment and labour law firm that provides timely and cost-effective legal advice to help employees and employers resolve workplace issues in Ottawa and across Ontario. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
Thus, the right of the employer to dismiss is not absolute.It will be interesting to see if this line of reasoning is followed in future Ontario court decisions. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
But in today’s 5-4 decision in Patel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:47 am
It is settled law that continuing employment does not provide sufficient consideration to introduce a new contract (see: Theberge-Lindsay v. 3395022 Canada Inc. 2018 ONSC 3222 at para 36). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 4:34 pm
This is a basic tenet of contract law and one that Ontario employers should keep in mind.A Practical ExampleA recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Gannon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:44 am
[2] See Coutinho v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
See, e.g., Mance v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
Judge Willett (concurring): There is no need for further analysis. [read post]
27 May 2021, 12:31 pm
See also: Bevilacqua v Gracious Living Corporation, 2016 ONSC 4127 (CanLII). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:53 am
See: Firatli v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
., P.A. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
But if Maine v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:33 am
See also Cummings v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:51 am
Without this requirement, the contract will likely be found unenforceable.For an example where an employment agreement was held unenforceable for lack of consideration, see: Kohler Canada Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:16 pm
” This controversial theory (see, e.g. [read post]
