Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 101 - 120
of 121,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 4:29 am
The two earlier decisions that the GC refers to rather served to explain why the weakness of the earlier marks did not avoid confusion (the CJEU’s decision in case C‑235/05 P on FLEX v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:10 am
Plaintiff’s claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court’s resolution of that issue in plaintiff’s prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Hence, the plaintiff in McRitchie v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] See generally Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 pm
/Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
” See, Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 2:03 pm
v=q2mZYJyhtZA. [read post]
30 May 2024, 1:52 pm
But both agree -- in my view, entirely correctly -- that while it might be second degree murder if you down a massive amount of oxycodone, speed recklessly, and crash into someone, it's not second degree murder if you chug the oxy, speed recklessly, crash yourself, and then half an hour later and a half-mile away, a truck driver doesn't see the resulting traffic jam and slams into someone, killing them.This is a classic example, I think, of the difference between but-for… [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] My Identifying Would-Be Jane Doe Litigant in Law Review Article Wasn't "Harassment,"
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
From Luo v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm
Citing its predecessor court’s seminal case of Radium Mines, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:46 am
Do not invade retirement unless you absolutely have to because you will drown financially otherwise or because you see a credit card balance that grows like topsy because the rate of interest is insane. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:36 am
A. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
(For more on the details of the challenge and what the Court’s holding means for the CFPB going forward, see this column I posted last week.) [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:33 pm
Snell v. [read post]
