Search for: "Self v. Executive Committee" Results 101 - 120 of 771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Those directors who serve as executive officers or who receive more than $120,000 in non-fee income, are not treated as independent. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
Becerra (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEA); Healthcare) United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Pozen & Kim Lane Scheppele, Executive Underreach, in Pandemics and Otherwise Martins Paparinskis, The Once and Future Law of State Responsibility Julian Arato, Kathleen Claussen, & J. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  With plaintiff’s and their attorneys increasingly are adding executives to the list of defendants named in their FLSA collective action claims, management should view appropriate FLSA compliance and risk management as critical to manage their own as well as their business’ liabilities. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
” The House Intelligence Committee then devoted half of its report to detailing the obstructive conduct, listing all the ways in which executive officials refused to comply with the inquiry. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
See Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:22 pm
This ethical opinion reinforces the rule that the prosecutors obligation to disclose certain types of information to the defense is self-executing - that is Brady, Kyles, Giglio, and similar material must be disclosed even though the defense has not submitted a formal discovery request -- and goes beyond what the R.C.M. and appellate decisions say. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
According to Chief Judge Gregory’s self-assigned seventy-page majority opinion, an American who seeks to be reunited with his alien wife suffers a constitutional injury because he felt like an “outsider. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
Whereas the duty to warn requires only a “self-produced warning,” Plaintiffs argue for an expansion of the duty to include editing and/or removal of user-generated content. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Federal law authorizes seven or more members (less than a majority) of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Oversight and Reform to request and to receive information from government agencies that is relevant to the performance of their Committee duties. [read post]
His argument was that international law has no judicially cognizable role in the U.S. legal system, except where the political branches explicitly incorporate it by statute, regulation or self-executing treaty. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Is the Executive Branch (the Department of Justice or the regulatory agencies) looking at the same issue? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:04 am by Juan Antunez
I brought the issue to the attention of Lee McElroy and the probate litigation committee of RPPTL. [read post]