Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 3,982
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Richard de la Harpe
In October 2013, a further series of agreements was concluded in terms of which Steinhoff International shares acquired by the sellers were sold to Wiesfam Trust (Pty) Ltd (sixth plaintiff). [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here's the North Carolina Court of Appeals court's analysis, from State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Difederico alleges as part of her proposed class action that Amazon entered into anticompetitive agreements with third-party sellers amounting to criminal price-fixing. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am by centerforartlaw
Pareda (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/seller-forged-basquiats-and-harings-arrested-fraud-charges) United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On August 24, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state-law securities claims in Kirschner v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In 2018, Brightstar—one of Harvestar’s biggest customers and a seller of refurbished phones—purchased a 51% controlling stock interest in Harvestar. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]