Search for: "Sellers v. State of Georgia"
Results 101 - 120
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Georgia: Ford v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:21 am
The Georgia business, for example, was a Georgia corporation, its principal and sole place of business in Georgia, all its revenues came from people personally visiting the store in Georgia, and did “not ship its goods out of state, nor does it sell firearms at gun shows”. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:33 pm
See Lynas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:46 am
City Dodge, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
The Supreme Court justices have opined that these laws protect Georgia homeowners and our state's housing market from being vexed to economic death. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
The Supreme Court justices have opined that these laws protect Georgia homeowners and our state's housing market from being vexed to economic death. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Under Georgia law, can a home buyer sue a seller who is unhappy with the house? [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Under Georgia law, can a home buyer sue a seller who is unhappy with the house? [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
§ 402.312(3), a customer without an indemnity contract may nonetheless seek indemnification from a seller if sued for infringement based on its use of the seller's product). [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Going beyond the terms of comment k, the Idaho court next decreed that “a seller next must establish that the product’s risk is in fact ‘unavoidable. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Fla. 1995) (same).GeorgiaThe Georgia consumer protection provides only for injunctive relief, Ga. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:48 am
In a recent case, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals has stated that revocation of acceptance under O.C.G.A. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
States such as Wisconsin, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and New York have had “prompt pay” acts in place for some time. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
State. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
And that just covers the United States. [read post]
