Search for: "Sellers v. State of North Carolina" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Sellers, Assistant Director for Public Affairs, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
”  Restate­ment (Third) of Torts, Products Liability) §9 (1998); accord id. at comment a (§9 “appl[ies] to commercial product sellers”). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the… [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
(North Carolina, at 2.5 percent, has the lowest-rate corporate income tax of states imposing one.) [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here's the North Carolina Court of Appeals court's analysis, from State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
 Sponsors from both parties, including in California and New York have introduced drafts, and bills have advanced quickly in Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Alabama presenting many of the same scoping problems. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:02 am by kevin-vonkamecke
See North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission, Inquiry No. 08-234, Public Reprimand of B. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm by Kevin Bankston
StubHub, Inc., overturned a trial court order that ignored the strong protection that federal law gives to online intermediaries and held online ticket site StubHub responsible for a user's violation of a North Carolina law that prohibits predatory ticket reselling. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm by Bexis
§2A:58C-4 (FDA approval of warning creates rebuttable presumption of warning adequacy); North Carolina:  N.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Evangelina Cantu
In contrast some states, for example, California and North Carolina, only tax prewritten software that is received in tangible form or can be downloadable into a tangible form (e.g, customers can back up the program to their own equipment). [read post]