Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 15,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
  However, the commentary in the Proposed Rule states that this threshold question is effectively tied to the sector descriptions in the critical infrastructure Sector-Specific Plans (“SSPs”) that were developed pursuant to PPD-21. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by The Collins Law Firm, P.C.
  And it did so to benefit the corporations that profit from making, selling, using, and polluting with ETO. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
The statute states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm by Bruce Zagaris
” According to Judge, Mexico alleges that the gun dealers aided and abetted the buyers who make false statements on the federal form required when a licensed dealer sells a gun. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm by Bruce Zagaris
” According to Judge, Mexico alleges that the gun dealers aided and abetted the buyers who make false statements on the federal form required when a licensed dealer sells a gun. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
And it did so in order to create a facial search engine of millions of innocent people to sell to law enforcement. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
Representing the NRA, David Cole of the American Civil Liberties Union characterized the case as a “straightforward” application of the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]