Search for: "Shack v. State" Results 101 - 118 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am by Russ Bensing
As a result of the elasticity of this standard, despite being on the books for a decade and a half, the issue has arisen in only one case here in Ohio, Ohio State Bar Assn. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The US is never one to shy away from seeking extradition of offenders once they have been identified, as the 23 year old British founder of the TV Shack website recently found out. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Their comments are premised on the presumption that AHIs are caused by a malign state based capability being deliberately applied against American human targets in various overseas and domestic locations. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am by admin
Instead they're visible and belligerent: As we saw in November, sometimes the best thing that can happen to a slum is for it to suffer a physical catastrophe, like a fire, that strips away the utterly inadequate housing and reveals thousands of people who suddenly have an urgent need, as we profiled in a four-part post on the conflagration that destroyed the Joe Slovo slum in Cape Town, in The urban palimpsest: Part 1, wiping the slate: The man for whom the settlement is named: Joe Slovo, South… [read post]