Search for: "Shah v. Shah"
Results 101 - 120
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
Shah Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Missouri v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In this case comment, David Bridge, Kenny Henderson, Jessica Foley, Devina Shah and Imtiyaz Chowdhury who all work within the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down earlier this month by the UK Supreme Court in this matter of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLC and others [2020] UKSC 24: On 17 June 2020, the Supreme Court handed down a significant judgment in the long-running, combined cases… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:07 pm
Shah – Effective March 28, 2011, sponsors and investigators of human drug and biological products subject to either an investigational new drug application ("IND") or bioavailability ("BA") or bioequivalence ("BE") studies exempt from IND requirements will have revised safety reporting requirements under the FDA regulations. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 6:16 pm
Shah, C.A. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
The law The issue of whether a claimant with an otherwise valid claim who substantially exaggerates that claim should lose their right to damages was considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Shah v Ul-Haq (2009) and Widlake v BAA Ltd (2009). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:09 pm
The Supreme Court of India resembled the council of rats in Aesop's fables while deciding Lok Prahari v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:35 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:40 am
Pahlavi, also known as the Shah of Iran was deposed by the religious clerics of Iran, including Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 6:37 pm
In the controversial case of Deepak Cables v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:27 am
" mophie inc v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 7:22 am
Contents include:Sangeeta Shah & Sandesh Sivakumaran, The Use of International Human Rights Law in the Universal Periodic Review Rebecca K Helm & Hitoshi Nasu, Regulatory Responses to ‘Fake News’ and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation Lene Guercke, State Responsibility for a Failure to Prevent Violations of the Right to Life by Organised Criminal Groups: Disappearances in Mexico Johan Rochel, Connecting the Dots: Digital Integrity as a Human… [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:54 pm
Akshar Global Investment Corp v City of Los Angeles, 817 Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Shah, 2015 WL 72118 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:33 am
We would like to thank Bhushan Shah for bringing this judgment to our attention)The Bombay High Court recently answered important questions pertaining to international taxation in SET Satellite Singapore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
The 2023 board agenda Posted by Carey Oven, Caroline Schoenecker and Bob Lamm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, on Friday, February 24, 2023 Tags: Board composition, Board of Directors, Climate change, climate disclosures, Cyber-risk, Stakeholders How To Fix The C-suite Diversity Problem Posted by Tina Shah Paikeday, and Nisa Qosja, Russell Reynolds Associates, on Saturday, February 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, C-suite, CEOs, Diversity, S&P100, S&P500 Delaware Supreme Court… [read post]
