Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Snap, Lee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In Navroth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm
See Underwager v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
Guest post by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) v Merck KGaA (formerly known as E Merck) [2021] 1 SLR 1102, [2021] SGCA 14 (“Merck”), noted previously, is a landmark case in Singapore private international law, being a decision of a full bench of the Court of Appeal setting out for the first… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Reyes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
On 21 December, however, a Home Office minister, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, announced in a Lords Written Answer that the raising of the income threshold will be staged, starting with an increase to £29,000 in the spring, and that was confirmed in a Home Office policy paper published on the same day. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
In sharp contrast, under the Biden administration, FTC Chair Lina Khan has repudiated consumer-welfare enhancement as the guiding light of competition enforcement. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
” To which the Minister, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, replied: “I thank the right reverend Prelate for his questions. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In a sharp 2-1 decision, the appeals court judges agreed with Jarkesy. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
From Fideldy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
Secondary meaning generally requires a showing that the design: has been in substantial commercial use (as shown by marketing budgets and materials, number of sales, surveys, and the like)the source has used the design continuously and exclusively (at least 5 years), and is distinctive (relative to other similar products).Trade dress protection can be raised as a legal claim in a law suit against, for example, someone selling or manufacturing knockoff products, such as in the Jason Scott Collection… [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
In Hening v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decided a case, BMW of North America v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Preemption specifically in the context of securities law has been litigated for decades, and many courts have struggled to draw a sharp line. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Monetary sanctions included approximately $1.6 billion in penalties—a sharp drop from last fiscal year’s $4.2 billion—and $3.4 billion in disgorgement. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Landmark cases include Milieudefensie v. [read post]
