Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 101 - 120
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
The top 10 employment discrimination settlements garnered $323.45 million in 2021, as compared to settlement figures of $422.68 in 2020 and $137.35 million in 2019, and the top 10 government enforcement action settlements garnered $146.38 million, a sharp decline from the 2020 total of $241 million, but a significant jump from the 2019 total of $57.52 million. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY City of Duarte v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 7:45 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 2:53 pm
From State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 10:36 am
EFF is supporting the plaintiffs in those cases, Sharpe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Rather, the First Amendment recognizes “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am
(Both of those cases were 5-4, with the conservatives in sharp dissent). [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:26 pm
While the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a sharp increase in family law conflict, these disputes have recently shifted to vaccination of minors. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
The LSE Blog has considered whether studying lived experience – without losing sight of its social, technical and political dimensions – can shed light on the tensions between desires of expanded experience and technological transparency. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:13 am
(L 199) 40 (EC), art 1 (2) (f). [4] See eg Case C-212/97, Centros Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
The importance of proving CGK was highlighted in a recent IP High Court case (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
The importance of proving CGK was highlighted in a recent IP High Court case (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 8:02 am
[Public support for Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 12:31 am
I don't know whether OPPO brought any patent infringement counteractions against Sharp, but I have been able to find out about a couple of Dutch declaratory judgment proceedings, such as one targeting Sharp's EP'181.Now, against Nokia, OPPO is also claiming that its own 5G patents are infringed. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:06 pm
Ginsburg was sharp as a tack. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
Sharp case. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
“It does represent really quite sharp concerns now in the Morrison government about a deteriorating security environment in the region, about China’s military buildup and about China’s willingness to use coercive power to pursue national interests,” says Richard Maude, senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
