Search for: "Shell v. Strong"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Royal Dutch Shell plc in May 2021, the Dutch court ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030 in response to an action filed by 17,000 Dutch citizens who said Shell’s investment in fossil fuels would threaten their human rights. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
It has operated on the belief that an efficient and strong IP system will foster innovations and creation for the benefit of society. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
Brent crude prices affect markets around the world and exert such a strong influence on the global economy that changes can affect stocks and other financial markets. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:02 am
(District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
More recently, PetroChina’s motive for its purchase of a 20% interest in Shell Canada’s Groundbirch shale gas project in British Columbia may well be to source the LNG that PetroChina plans to buy from the Shell Canada consortium’s LNG project. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am
Shell has a peculiar value. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
However, anyone - including large corporations who themselves are proponents of strong intellectual property rights - may be entitled to assert fair use. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
To conceal the hush money payment, it was agreed that Cohen would make the payment to Daniels via a shell company (Essential Consultants), on the agreement that Trump would later reimburse Cohen. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
See Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:48 am
Arenas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
A new version of the LEED rating system (LEED 2009 or LEED v.3) was released for public comment in May 2008. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am
-listed publicly traded shell company. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
There is now a strong majority for gun control reforms. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am
-listed publicly traded shell company. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
