Search for: "Sherlock v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 9:47 am by Wendy Seltzer
The Supreme Court's long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm by James Eckert
The Court of Appeals has addressed whether someone is registerable both via Article 78 and direct appeal (North v Board, 8 NY3d 735 [2007]; People v Kennedy, 7 NY3d 87 [2006]). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
  Yet in this decision causation is the dog that didn't bark, as in the famous Sherlock Holmes story, The Adventure of Silver Blaze: Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): "Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention? [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
Bring on Sherlock Holmes . . .and at least one lawyer, trained in evidence . . . pro bono publico.THE GERUM CLOAK MYSTERYThe more than 2000-year old Cloak of Gerum (photos and info below) provides us - as we will show - with the greatest "real" (non-fiction) cloak and dagger mystery of all time, unsolved up to now, but - as we allege - for the most part solved (but not entirely) in this posting.The technology that we use to solve this mystery is demonstrated in the following… [read post]