Search for: "Sherman v. Price"
Results 101 - 120
of 801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2007, 12:46 pm
Circuit in holding that foreigner victims of price-fixing may not recover under the Sherman Act unless they show that the the price fixers' domestic activities proximately caused their overseas injury (overpayments for the relevant product). [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:16 am
Lane v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
Spahr v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
The emergence of generics typically resulted in price competition that enabled drug purchasers both to buy generic versions of a drug at a substantially lower price and to buy the branded version at a reduced price, the court explained. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
This was consistent with federal antitrust law at the time, as the law before Leegin was that vertical price fixing was a per se violation under the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
Savory Pie Guy, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
Savory Pie Guy, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
Z Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
” Starr v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:59 pm
Gilley Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Needle v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
As this blog has discussed previously, the law surrounding resale price maintenance has been unclear ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
The plaintiffs, a financial services firm and two proprietary trading firms, contend that the banks abused their position as primary dealers to manipulate an important benchmark in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, the Sherman Act, and common law (Breakwater Trading LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Agreements among market competitors that deliberately restrict or restrain trade, such as price-fixing, clearly violate the Sherman Act. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
