Search for: "Short v. Davis "
Results 101 - 120
of 962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2022, 7:36 am
[Anguilla][Consent][Petition Denied] In Davis v Lake, 2022 WL 17843545 (District Court, W.D. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:31 am
Davies v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
And a short time later, Gov. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Proc., § 2017.010; see Davies v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:12 am
Cypress Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Davis 8. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:27 am
Davis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
Today in Jones v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:28 am
Davis (C.A. 6, 2005), 430 F.3d 345, 357. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 6:39 am
ShareEach weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In 2008, the House of Lords gave judgment in R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36; [2008] 1 AC 1128. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:58 am
Now the 1st DCA has found in Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:49 pm
i4i Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:11 pm
" In U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm
Ct. 1849 (2011), and Davis v. [read post]
