Search for: "Short v. Hill" Results 101 - 120 of 965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Ecclesiastical Law Journal The latest issue of the EccLJ is now available, including: Daniel J Hill, ‘Could the State do Without Marriage Law? [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Brad Dress reports for The Hill. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Jordan Williams reports for The Hill. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Caroline Vakil reports for The Hill. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But when Stephen Breyer finally retires—none too soon—there will be no one on the Court who has ever spent quality time on Capitol Hill actually experiencing what the process of legislating is like at the national level or, like Sandra Day O’Connor, serving as a legislative leader charged with herding cats and procuring necessary compromises. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by jonathanturley
In fairness to Jackson, the law was similar to a Colorado law upheld by the Court 6-3 in Hill v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
 But, because even these principles have exceptions, as highlighted in Frank McRoberts’ post on the curious case of Webster v Forest Hills Care Ctr., LLC, which suggested that the right to an accounting might be absolute. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:47 am by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
A fairly substantial group of several thousand protestors gathered on Parliament Hill Saturday to air their grievances. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am by SHG
Indeed, no amendment that has cleared Article V’s two high bars has ever been excluded from the Constitution — until now. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, plaintiff failed to show, as required to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, that but for defendants’ conduct he would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]