Search for: "Sierra Club v. DOE"
Results 101 - 120
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
” (Quoting the Friant Ranch decision, Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
(See, Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
“reverse CEQA”), CEQA does require an analysis when a project exacerbates an environmental impact, e.g., wildfire risk; Add energy as an impact category for MNDs (and not just EIRs) with new questions requiring analysis of a project’s energy consumption and compliance with state or local energy laws; Clarifies that both state and federal wetland impacts must be evaluated; Clarifies that public, not private, view impacts are relevant to a CEQA analysis; and Moves… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
County of San Diego/Sierra Club, LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
The Sierra Club files a writ to stop a Wal-Mart store, and loses. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
(See, e.g., Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
[Paul Cassell] Is Membership in a Conservation Organization Proof of Criminal Intent to Harm Cattle?
9 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
For example, in Dawson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the Tenth Circuit referenced its own recent decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Wade y acá Doe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Ministerial/Discretionary Distinction The First District helpfully elaborated on CEQA’s “functional test” for determining whether an agency’s project approval action is ministerial, rather than discretionary, in nature and therefore not subject to CEQA in Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Judge Wilson observed that the appeal presented a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: does FCA article 10-A provide an independent grant of continuing jurisdiction that survives the dismissal of the underlying article 10 neglect petition? [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Judge Wilson observed that the appeal presented a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: does FCA article 10-A provide an independent grant of continuing jurisdiction that survives the dismissal of the underlying article 10 neglect petition? [read post]
