Search for: "Simmons v. Powers" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Trustees of Columbia Univ., 816 N.Y.S. 2d 695 (2006) (successor liability imposed against purchaser of assets free and clear of claims in bankruptcy proceeding); Simmons v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
The event began with an overview of the unitary patent and unified patent court system by Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons) who has been serving on the Drafting Committee of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents the eighth volume in his rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
Simmons when the Court ruled that executing juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment guarantee against “cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm by Jeff Gamso
Simmons) and we don't kill for non-homicide (Kennedy v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am by Florian Mueller
While that case is at the intersection of patent and antitrust law, Justice Smith also hears purely technical patent cases (see this article by law firm Simmons & Simmons).In addition to Oxford, he studied at the University of Munich. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
" Simmons Fastener Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Congressional Power is provided by Article I of the Constitution, which vests “[a]ll legislative Powers . . . in a Congress,” which has certain “Powers,” including (most importantly for the Supreme Court) the power “[t]o regulate Commerce . . . among the several States. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:02 am by Lyle Denniston
  This time, the Court denied review of Simmons v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm by David Lat
Reed Smith (female partner claiming the best work went to women who slept with partners in management), or Simmons v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
He also argues that Alabama’s capital sentencing statute, which gives the judge final sentencing power after an advisory verdict by a jury, is unconstitutional under Hurst v. [read post]