Search for: "Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Zinke (Federal Recognition)United States v. 99,337 Pieces of Counterfeit Native American Jewelry (Indian Arts and Crafts Act; Counterfeit Jewlery)Texas v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Conor McEvily
DaugaardDocket: 10-1058Issue(s): Whether the Yankton Sioux Reservation includes all lands within its original boundaries other than those the Tribe ceded to the United States for sale to non-Indians in the Act of 1894.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (8th Circuit)Conditional Cross-Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am by Mack Sperling
  The loan agreements also provided that they were "governed by the Indian Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States of America and the laws of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:35 am by Matthew Campbell
Here are the briefs on the United States’ and TransCanada’s Motions to Dismiss Rosebud and Fort Belknap’s treaty and jurisdiction claims regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Watso v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Department of Interior (Whistleblowing) Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Cynthia R. Harris
United States created two exceptions recognizing tribes’ civil jurisdiction over non-members. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Monte Mills
In 1823, Chief Justice John Marshall concluded in Johnson v. [read post]