Search for: "Slade v. Slade" Results 101 - 116 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 7:13 am by Josh Wright
Hosken, Empirical Methods in Merger Analysis: Econometric Analysis of Pricing in FTC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1299 [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:59 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Supreme Court term, the Harvard Law Review addresses the Court's most important decisions, and this year includes the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:27 am by war
Chiropedic Bedding Pty Ltd v Radburg Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1163 So far as I can see, no application for leave to appeal has been filed. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:19 am
Slade v Slade Court of Appeal “When a civil court was sentencing a contemnor for conduct which had already been the subject of sentencing for a criminal conviction, it was essential that the second court should be fully informed of the factors and circumstances reflected in the first sentence. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:44 am
Slade v Slade [2009] EWCA Civ 748; [2009] WLR (D) 248 “When a court was sentencing a contemnor for conduct which had already been the subject of sentencing founded upon a criminal conviction it was essential that the second court should be fully informed of the factors and circumstances reflected in the first sentence. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hutchison 3G UK Ltd v The Office of Communications [2009] EWCA Civ 683 (16 July 2009) Slade v Slade [2009] EWCA Civ 748 (17 July 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS (Sussex) v Mattu [2009] EWCA Crim 1483 (17 July 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Manhire, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of [...] [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
He relied on a useful encapsulation of the law by Slade J in Powell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:15 am
The order was made by the Magistrates and the father appealed, on the basis that he had paid the child support, but just by a different method.Decision: Mrs Justice Slade in the High Court agreed with the father. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:24 pm
Slade Metcalf of Hogan & Hartson argued for Levitt.Evans and Sykes asked all the questions. [read post]