Search for: "Smith v. Department of Employment"
Results 101 - 120
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 8:56 pm
The Court in Collins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:58 pm
Lee Smith, and Proskauer Rose. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
If you have any questions about the implications of the Court’s ruling, Reed Smith’s experienced employment attorneys are available to help. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York State… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York State… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:15 am
And most recently, in Marlow v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
The similarities between City of Boerne and the Title VI regulations are many: Just as the Supreme Court has authoritatively held that Fourteenth Amendment free exercise violations occur only when the state acts purposely to constrict free exercise, see Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
By Kevin Smith and Brian Murphy On July 9, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Torres et al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Code 55-3700.61 (“The Department delegates its authority under Article IX of the Public Welfare Code (62 P.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
In Alvarado v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
"In contrast, in Smith v Davis, a case involving alleged violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act and other civil rights law violations, decided by the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:27 pm
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., 397 F.3d1370, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Department of Labor issues guidance on requirement that employers provide nursing mothers with breaks and places to express breast milkReed Smith LLPA little-noticed provision of the 2010 health care reform legislation requires employers to provide nursing mothers with "reasonable break time" to express breast milk for one year after a child's birth.Department of Labor interpretation expands the “compensable workday”Holme Roberts &… [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:11 am
Whether Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 5:43 pm
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
